Software translation
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/gsjournal/albert-einstein-is-a-farce-t5944.html
Professor Lattes, the English physicist Stephen Hawking said in his book “A Brief History of Time” that physicists have spent too much time in the particle physics research. Do you agree with that?
Lattes: That book sucks, it sucks. He does not have any representation in physics. His fame is only the fruit press. He is a bad character. The Newton biography summary of what he did showed that he died of envy of Newton. Hawking called the greatest physicist of all evil character times, I liked money … it’s a poor guy.
But he is a highly regarded physical …
Lattes: It can be conceptualized in the press, but it is not respected in scientific circles.
You are considered a critic of Einstein, right?
Lattes: Einstein is a fraud, a beast! He did not know the difference between a physical quantity and a unit of measurement, an elementary failure.
And where exactly he committed the fault which are you talking about?
Lattes: When he plagiarized the theory of relativity the French physicist and mathematician Henri Poincaré in 1905.
[ Henri Poincaré and relativity: 1900, 1905, https://hal.science/hal-04177545/ ]
The theory of relativity is not his invention. Has been around for centuries. Comes the Renaissance, Leonardo Da Vinci, Galileo and Giordano Bruno. He did not invent relativity. Who carried out the correct calculations for relativity Poincaré was. Einstein’s fame is more the result of his lobby in physics than its merits as a scientist. He plagiarized the theory of relativity. If you take the physical history book of Whittaker, you will see that relativity theory is attributed to Henri Poincaré and Hawdrik Lawrence. In the first edition of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, which he called the theory of relativity, he confused as to quantity. In the second edition, the general theory of relativity, he mistook the number to the measure. A great nonsense. Einstein was always a dubious person. He was a pacifist who influenced Roosevelt to make the atomic bomb. Moreover, he did not like to Shower.
Anatoly Alexeevich Logunov on special relativity (2004)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute
In Anatoly Logunov‘s book[B 20] about Poincaré’s relativity theory, there is an English translation (on p. 113, using modern notations) of the part of Poincaré’s 1900 article containing E=mc2. Logunov states that Poincaré’s two 1905 papers are superior to Einstein’s 1905 paper. According to Logunov, Poincaré was the first scientist to recognize the importance of invariance under the Poincaré group as a guideline for developing new theories in physics. In chapter 9 of this book, Logunov points out that Poincaré’s second paper was the first one to formulate a complete theory of relativistic dynamics, containing the correct relativistic analogue of Newton’s F=ma.
On p. 142, Logunov points out that Einstein wrote reviews for the Beiblätter Annalen der Physik, writing 21 reviews in 1905. In his view, this contradicts the claims that Einstein worked in relative isolation and with limited access to the scientific literature. Among the papers reviewed in the Beiblätter in the fourth (of 24) issue of 1905, there is a review of Lorentz’ 1904 paper by Richard Gans, which contains the Lorentz transformations. In Logunov’s view, this supports the view that Einstein was familiar with the Lorentz’ paper containing the correct relativistic transformation in early 1905, while his June 1905 paper does not mention Lorentz in connection with this result.
Ape Town 